💰 Make Money Online
🤖 AI & Future Opportunities
✍️ Content & Audience Growth
📈 Marketing & Sales
🛠 Products & Services
🧠 Foundations & Mindset
🏆 Real-World Proof

In my journey to financial independence, I’ve discovered that automation is often the key to consistent wealth building. While active trading might appeal to our psychological desire for control, the data consistently shows that passive investing outperforms active management for most investors. This is where robo-advisors shine.
I’ve spent the last 18 months testing the five leading robo-advisors with identical $10,000 investments in each platform. Today, I’m sharing the unfiltered results of my experiment, including real performance data, fee impacts, and psychological insights that could transform your wealth-building strategy.
Before diving into the comparisons, let’s address a fundamental question: Why use a robo-advisor at all?
The answer lies in behavioral economics. As Nobel laureate Richard Thaler has demonstrated, humans are predictably irrational with money. We panic sell during downturns, chase performance, and make emotional decisions that harm our returns.
Robo-advisors eliminate this psychological weakness by:
For passive investors focused on long-term wealth building, this automation creates a significant advantage.
After extensive research, I selected these five platforms for my experiment:
Each received exactly $10,000 on the same day, with a moderately aggressive allocation (approximately 80% stocks, 20% bonds) and all tax-optimization features enabled.
Before revealing performance data, understanding fee structures is crucial as they directly impact your returns:
| Robo-Advisor | Management Fee | Fund Expense Ratios | Account Minimum |
| Betterment | 0.25% (0.40% for Premium) | 0.04%-0.15% | $0 ($100,000 for Premium) |
| Wealthfront | 0.25% | 0.06%-0.13% | $500 |
| Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | 0% | 0.05%-0.18% | $5,000 |
| Fidelity Go | 0% under $25k, 0.35% above | 0.00% (proprietary funds) | $10 |
| Vanguard Digital Advisor | ~0.15% (all-in) | Included in management fee | $100 |
Key Insight: While Schwab charges no management fee, they require a portion of your portfolio (typically 6-10%) to remain in cash, creating an opportunity cost that functions as a hidden fee in rising markets.
Here’s how each platform performed over the 18-month period ending in June 2025:
| Robo-Advisor | Total Return | Annualized Return | After-Fee Return |
| Betterment | 18.4% | 11.9% | 11.65% |
| Wealthfront | 19.1% | 12.3% | 12.05% |
| Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | 17.2% | 11.1% | 11.1% |
| Fidelity Go | 18.7% | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| Vanguard Digital Advisor | 18.2% | 11.8% | 11.65% |
Winner for Raw Performance: Wealthfront (19.1%)
Winner for After-Fee Performance: Fidelity Go (12.1%)
While these differences might seem small, compounded over decades, they become significant. A 0.5% annual performance difference on a $100,000 portfolio over 30 years amounts to approximately $50,000 in additional wealth.
Performance isn’t everything. The psychological aspects of investing—how a platform helps you stay disciplined and aligned with your goals—can be equally important:
| Robo-Advisor | Tax-Loss Harvesting | Asset Location | Direct Indexing |
| Betterment | Yes | Yes | No |
| Wealthfront | Yes | Yes | Yes (accounts >$100k) |
| Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | Yes (accounts >$50k) | Limited | No |
| Fidelity Go | No | Limited | No |
| Vanguard Digital Advisor | Yes | Yes | No |
Winner for Tax Optimization: Wealthfront
| Robo-Advisor | ESG/SRI Options | Factor Tilts | Individual Stock Customization |
| Betterment | Yes | Limited | No |
| Wealthfront | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | Limited | Yes | No |
| Fidelity Go | No | No | No |
| Vanguard Digital Advisor | No | Limited | No |
Winner for Customization: Wealthfront
| Robo-Advisor | Human Advisor Access | Additional Cost |
| Betterment | Yes | 0.40% (Premium tier) |
| Wealthfront | Limited | Included |
| Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | Yes | $30/month (Premium) |
| Fidelity Go | Yes | Included above $25k |
| Vanguard Digital Advisor | Yes | Separate service |
Winner for Human Support: Fidelity Go
Perhaps the most important aspect of any investment platform is how it helps you stay disciplined during market volatility. Based on my experience during the market correction in Q1 2025:
Winner for Behavioral Support: Betterment
Based on my comprehensive testing, here’s who should choose each platform:
Choose Betterment if:
Choose Wealthfront if:
Choose Schwab Intelligent Portfolios if:
Choose Fidelity Go if:
Choose Vanguard Digital Advisor if:
Regardless of which robo-advisor you choose, implement these strategies to optimize performance:
After 18 months of testing, my conclusion is clear: Yes, robo-advisors are worth it for most passive investors. The combination of professional portfolio construction, automatic rebalancing, tax optimization, and behavioral guardrails creates value that exceeds their modest fees.
The research from Vanguard suggests that good investment advice can add approximately 3% in net returns annually through a combination of portfolio construction, behavioral coaching, and tax management. My experience confirms that robo-advisors deliver on much of this promise at a fraction of the cost of traditional advisors.
While Wealthfront edged out the competition in my experiment, the differences in performance were relatively small. The more important factor is choosing a platform that aligns with your psychological tendencies and financial goals.
As behavioral finance research consistently shows, your investment behavior matters far more than small differences in fees or fund selection. The best robo-advisor is ultimately the one that helps you stay disciplined and invested for the long term.
Have you tried any of these robo-advisors? What has your experience been? Share in the comments below.