💰 Make Money Online
🤖 AI & Future Opportunities
✍️ Content & Audience Growth
📈 Marketing & Sales
🛠 Products & Services
🧠 Foundations & Mindset
🏆 Real-World Proof

Twelve months ago, I made a decision that would test one of the most compelling wealth-building strategies available to modern investors: real estate crowdfunding. Rather than relying on theoretical comparisons or marketing claims, I invested identical amounts in the two leading platforms—Fundrise and RealtyMogul—to determine which truly delivers superior returns and user experience.
Today, I’m sharing the unfiltered results of my $10,000 investment in each platform, including actual returns, fee impacts, and psychological insights that could transform your approach to passive real estate investing.
Before diving into the platform comparison, let’s address why real estate crowdfunding deserves consideration in your wealth-building strategy.
As research from Yale economist Robert Shiller has demonstrated, real estate has historically provided returns comparable to stocks (around 8.6% annually) but with significantly lower volatility and limited correlation to public markets. This makes it an ideal portfolio diversifier.
Real estate crowdfunding platforms have democratized access to this asset class, allowing investors to:
The question isn’t whether real estate belongs in your portfolio—it’s which platform delivers the best risk-adjusted returns with the least friction.
To ensure a valid comparison between Fundrise and RealtyMogul, I structured my experiment as follows:
This approach eliminated variables that might skew the comparison, allowing for a direct evaluation of platform performance, user experience, and overall value proposition.
Before revealing my returns, understanding the structural differences between these platforms is crucial:
| Feature | Fundrise | RealtyMogul |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Minimum Investment | $10 | $5,000 |
| Fee Structure | 1% total (0.85% asset management, 0.15% advisory) | 1-1.25% management fee + project-specific fees |
| Investment Options | eREITs, eFunds | MogulREIT I & II, individual properties |
| Investor Requirements | Open to non-accredited investors | REITs open to all; individual deals require accreditation |
| Liquidity | Quarterly redemption windows (with potential penalties) | Limited liquidity; 3-7 year investment horizons |
| Property Focus | Residential, commercial, industrial | Commercial focus (retail, office, multifamily) |
These structural differences create distinct investment experiences that impact not just returns, but also psychological comfort and long-term commitment to the investment.
Now for the data you’ve been waiting for—here’s how each platform performed over my 12-month investment period:
Winner for Total Return: Fundrise (+11.7% vs. +9.7%)
While both platforms delivered solid performance, Fundrise outperformed RealtyMogul by approximately 2% over the 12-month period. However, RealtyMogul provided slightly higher dividend income, which may appeal to investors prioritizing cash flow over total return.
Investment returns tell only part of the story. The psychological aspects of platform usability, transparency, and communication significantly impact investor satisfaction and long-term commitment.
Winner for User Experience: Fundrise
The Fundrise mobile app and intuitive dashboard created a significantly better user experience, making it easier to track performance and understand portfolio composition. This psychological aspect shouldn’t be underestimated—platforms that reduce friction and increase transparency tend to encourage long-term investment commitment.
Understanding what you actually own is crucial for evaluating risk and potential returns. Here’s how my investments were allocated on each platform:
Geographic Diversification: 23 states, with concentrations in TX, FL, NC, GA, and AZ
Geographic Diversification: 14 states, with concentrations in TX, CA, FL, and NY
Diversification Winner: Fundrise
Fundrise provided broader diversification across both property types and geographic locations, potentially reducing risk through greater portfolio variation. However, RealtyMogul’s higher concentration in multifamily properties—historically a stable asset class—may appeal to more conservative investors.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of my experiment came during the interest rate fluctuations in Q1 2025, when public REITs experienced significant volatility. Here’s how each platform performed during this turbulent period:
Both platforms demonstrated remarkable stability compared to public REITs, validating the core thesis that private real estate offers reduced correlation to public markets. However, Fundrise’s proactive communication during market volatility provided greater psychological comfort, which is invaluable for maintaining long-term investment discipline.
While both platforms advertise approximately 1% in management fees, the actual cost structure is more nuanced:
Fee Efficiency Winner: Fundrise
While the difference may seem minimal, the 0.25% lower fee structure of Fundrise creates a meaningful advantage over long investment horizons due to compounding effects. On a $100,000 investment over 10 years, this difference could amount to thousands of dollars in additional returns.
Real estate is inherently illiquid, but crowdfunding platforms have created mechanisms for earlier access to capital if needed:
Liquidity Winner: Fundrise
While neither platform offers true liquidity comparable to public markets, Fundrise provides more flexible redemption options and typically processes requests more quickly. This creates an important psychological safety net for investors who may need access to capital unexpectedly.
The tax treatment of crowdfunded real estate investments significantly impacts actual returns:
Tax Efficiency Winner: Tie
Both platforms offer similar tax advantages inherent to real estate investing. However, RealtyMogul’s individual property investments may provide more granular tax benefits for sophisticated investors, while Fundrise offers simpler tax reporting for most users.
The entry point for each platform creates significantly different investor experiences:
Accessibility Winner: Fundrise
Fundrise’s remarkably low $10 minimum democratizes access to real estate investing, allowing investors to start small and increase contributions as they gain confidence. This psychological on-ramp reduces barriers to entry and enables dollar-cost averaging into the asset class.
Based on my experience, here’s who should choose each platform:
Choose Fundrise if:
Choose RealtyMogul if:
Regardless of which platform you choose, implement these strategies to optimize performance:
Perhaps the most valuable insight from my 12-month experiment wasn’t about returns but about psychology. During periods when my stock investments experienced significant volatility, the stability of these real estate platforms provided a psychological anchor that prevented emotional decision-making.
As behavioral finance research has consistently shown, investment behavior—not just investment selection—is often the primary determinant of long-term returns. The reduced volatility of private real estate creates a psychological environment conducive to maintaining long-term investment discipline.
After 12 months of parallel investments, Fundrise emerges as the superior overall platform for most investors, delivering:
However, RealtyMogul remains a strong contender, particularly for accredited investors seeking higher dividend yields or access to individual property investments.
The most important conclusion is that both platforms have delivered on the core promise of real estate crowdfunding: providing accessible, passive exposure to private real estate with returns that outpace many traditional investment options.
For investors seeking to build wealth through real estate without the headaches of direct ownership, both platforms offer compelling value propositions—though Fundrise’s edge in total returns, user experience, and accessibility makes it the recommended choice for most investors.
Have you invested in either of these platforms? What has your experience been with returns and user experience? Share in the comments below.